Archive for Intel Technology
Overall Value Of Intel’S X58 Motherboard
Posted by: | CommentsSome of the new features of the Intel X58 motherboard include Triple-channel memory, the addition of the LGA 1366 platform for the new Core i7 Nehalem processors, and Intel’s QPI(QuickPath Interconnect) system. All of these new features add flare to this new motherboard, and it also makes it a fantastic investment if you have the money. However, this motherboard is not for everyone. There are three factors for this:1. Money2. Needs3. The FutureI’m going to start off by talking about money. Now, just the motherboard and processor costs a minimum of 500 dollars(that’s if you get the cheapest X58 motherboard and the 920, the lowest Core i7 processor). Now, that’s just two components, meaning that if you have a low budget(anywhere under 1000 dollars), you’ve already spent half or more than half of your budget. And that’s just the beginning; you also need some memory(which is still somewhat expensive), and that takes you up to 600 dollars. Now, most people are in the low-budget and mid-budget range, and spending 600 dollars on just three components of their new computer is somewhat ridiculous. Now, if you’re one of the people in the high-budget range. . . go ahead, buy the combination. You will all watch us drool as we watch you put the computer together and watch how quickly and efficiently the computer carries out your wishes and commands. Now, the second factor is needs. Right now, the X58 motherboard in combination with the Core i7 and triple-channel enabled memory will absolutely rip apart any competition it has in its way. Now, if you’re out for the best of the best and you have no concern about money, then that’s no problem. However, we also have to think about over-performance. Over-performance is basically where your computer is too good for whatever you throw at it(programs, multitasking, etc. ), having more power than you need. Now, if you’re going to play some games and do some Internet-surfing, then you would obviously not need the combination; the processor itself can handle up to 8 threads, and you’ll probably just use one, two threads max. Now, if you’re constantly video-editing, Photoshop-ing, high-quality gaming, and many things at once, then you may want to invest in this combination. Now, the future. When I talk about “future” I mean in terms of what Intel will be releasing, and when Intel releases new things. I also include things like price and performance. How much longer until Intel releases a new, better processor and motherboard(reformed version)? How much will this new technology cost? Will it fit in your budget? How will these new releases perform compared to the current Core i7 Nehalem processors and X58 motherboards? Well, that’s in store in the future, we will not know until Intel tells us.
Intel Health Guide: Diving Head First Into Home Health Monitoring
Posted by: | CommentsAfter over three years of research, development, and market study, Intel announced the launch of the Intel Health Guide, an Intel-branded device for remotely monitoring and managing patients with chronic illness at home.
From Intel’s demo one can see that the device is a laptop computer no keyboard and a reversed touch-screen. Patients can connect and upload blood pressure monitors and other medical devices to communicate results with remote health care providers. In addition to vital sign data collection, the health monitoring software also provides patient reminders, surveys, educational content, and other communication tools.
Although Intel appears to be targeting at the same chronic disease management market, the Health Guide from Intel adds features and functions far beyond its predecessor Health Buddy from Health Hero Network, now a division of Robert Bosch. It will be interesting to see whether or the enhanced functionality such as video conferencing and multimedia content will be the key to market adoption.
The real barriers to adoption of remote monitoring and other chronic care strategies may be less about functionality than about institutional incentives and business models ingrained in our health care system. The health care market with Medicare in the lead still rewards health care providers far more for treating the complications of chronic illness than it does for proactive management and monitoring aimed at preventing them.
The incentive systems that determine the viability of new models of health care enabled by devices like the Intel Health Guide and the Bosch Health Buddy could be about to change, however. With favorable results from the Medicare chronic care improvement demonstration project currently underway from Health Hero Network in Washington and Oregon, Medicare coverage for health care providers to offer home health monitoring services may be around the corner.
Steve Brown is an entrepreneur and active board member in innovative software and Internet businesses. He is the founder and former CEO of Health Hero Network, a pioneer in ehealth and remote health monitoring, acquired by Bosch in 2007. Steve Brown blogs at http://brown2020. com.
Intel’s X58 Chipset
Posted by: | CommentsHey everyone, this is Icarus here with some thought on the new Intel X58 chipset.
The Intel X58 chipset was released during November of 2008, and was released as a successor of X48. Now, the importance here is not just the name itself; this is a direct challenge to all of the computer hardware companies out there that have been making large amounts of money off of nVidia chipset motherboards. Now, how does this effect you, the consumer who has sparked an interest in computer hardware?
Well, here’s the thing: the X58 chipset can run SLI. Yes, I just said that: it can run SLI. For those of you who don’t know what SLI is, I will explain it in another article today. For now, I will just say that SLI is a program created by NVidia that allows the computer to run more than one video card at the same time.
Now, why does SLI in the X58 matter so much? Well here’s the reason why: it takes away a valuable advantage NVidia chipsets had over Intel chipsets. Traditionally, Intel chipsets were only able to run Crossfire and CrossfireX, or just a single NVidia video card without SLI. NVidia chipsets, on the other hand, can only run NVidia Graphics cards(with the exception of patches for some ATI graphics cards) but can run two in SLI and even three in TriSLI. However, now that the X58 can run NVidia graphics cards(GPU’s), more consumers will begin to turn to this chipset.
Now, NVidia loses more than one battle here. One of NVidia chipsets motherboards’ main concerns for consumers was the price tag. The fact is, that many NVidia chipset motherboards are more expensive than the Intel chipset motherboards. However, this was justifiable because NVidia still had the SLI and TriSLI advantage over Intel chipsets. Now that the X58 chipset can run NVidia GPU’s in SLI, NVidia has lost one advantage, and lots its justification for the price tags. And because most consumers only go as far as running two graphics cards in SLI, NVidia may lose a lot of loyal customers.
However, this does not mean that NVidia will fade away or go bankrupt. X58 chipset motherboards can run two graphics cards in SLI, but it cannot run three graphics cards in SLI. NVidia can; therefore, NVidia still gets to keep the enthusiast market under its arms. Another advantage NVidia still has is its apparent ability to overclock better than Intel chipsets. While this advantage may seem to be mysterious because most consumers do not know why this is so, this is still an advantage that NVidia will hold onto. Therefore, NVidia will still be able to keep most of the consumers who know how to overclock well.
One Laptop Per Child’s Xo or Intel’s Classmate for American Children?
Posted by: | CommentsThere are many comparisons being made between the OLPC and Intelâs Classmate. I personally feel that the differences far outweigh the likeness of these two products. There is growing controversy as to which product should be chosen for particular groups and the increasing competitiveness. I believe that they are intended for distinctively different users.
One Laptop per Child is an non-profit organization that oversees the Children’s Machine project and the construction of the XO-1 or $100 laptop initiated in 2005. This laptop has been created as a learning tool intended for the poorest children who live in the most remote areas. It is intended to help the user learn learning. The design is child friendly, rugged and durable. The interface encourages community, collaboration, and working and playing together. The system is set to be programmed by the child not vice versa! Although termed the $100 laptop the cost is actually approximately $130 to $140 and is described as being a floating price that chairperson Nicholas Negroponte hopes will decrease with each release. The focus of this project is education for underprivileged groups in remote locations such as Uruguay, Cambodia, Peru and Mexico using the laptop as a learning tool.
In a similar vein Intelâs World Ahead Program was established in May 2006. Intel intended on building chips that function as a platform for manufacturerâs to build their own low cost laptops. They developed their own version, The Classmate PC. This is a for profit item running roughly about 400 US Dollars. Intelâs intended users for these low cost laptop personal computers are children in the developing world.
The Classmate provides technology that is Windows based. Therefore they are learning the currently dominant technology. This is very inflexible and also runs the risk of vendor lock in. In contrast, the XO uses free and open source software. This allows the user to modify their environment and learn through doing. XO uses mesh networking to extend the reach of the internet. The Classmate does not use neighboring laptops to extend the reach of the internet. The Classmate is much more expensive has a considerably smaller wifi range and uses 10 times the power needed for the XO. Many of the schools in these remote areas have outdoor classrooms and The Classmate was not made to be used outside.
Structure differences include:
Memory: Intelâs Classmate PC has 256MB DDR2 SO-DIMM memory while OLPC laptop has 128MB of DRAM.
Flash Memory: Classmate PC has 1GB NAND flash memory while OLPC laptop has 500MB of Flash memory.
Operating system: Intelâs Classmate PC uses Windows XP. On the other hand, OLPC laptops uses Linux.
A significant issue and the one I think with the largest effect on any intended American user is the Web. Apparently, XOâs connection is finicky and weak. When attempting to access Flash and Java based sites it tends to sputter and stall due to its small memory capacity. This is the most important factor in Intelâs favor.
In my opinion however, it does not isolate the XO from being a great choice in a lot of developing world groups. The educational structure of XOâs system and its use of free and open source software is notable and it does have web capabilities although they are not optimal that can be extended through the connectivity of neighboring laptops. Also, the requirement of far less power needed to run, being able to run outdoors and a considerably lower cost are major factors that keep the XO the better choice of product for many of its intended market.
There are many comparisons being made between the OLPC and Intelâs Classmate. I personally feel that the differences far outweigh the likeness of these two products. An analysis of the environment, educational status and goals of the intended user will bring about a logical choice between two very different products.
Please use the link above to visit us at The Software Spot!
Thank you, Allison Merlino
Intel Joined Goole Fight Against Apple Plans to Sns
Posted by: | CommentsIn the Web 2. 0 Summit, the world’s largest manufacturer demonstrated corporate social networks and more personalized features of the Internet. Intel CEO Paul Otellini (Paul Otellini) last Thursday at the Web 2. 0 Summit, said Intel has joined a white-hot trend of corporate social networks. Otellini showed off its “Enterprise 2. 0″ model of social networks, he said that Intel would develop a substitute for consumer services, including as Facebook and MySpace, the social networking companies are ready to accept the necessary security and management capabilities. He also demonstrated the future of a “personal Internet”, is based on Intel and services using mobile devices. Otellini demonstrated a prototype of the social networking system to help new employees even though the company familiar with the environment. For example, my colleagues can show photos and profiles can also provide a variety of links. The new staff quickly familiar with their team, the network’s understanding of the projects and colleagues familiar with the company. It also integrates a comprehensive work calendar, instant messaging tools, video, voice and e-mail and so on to facilitate the exchange and sharing of documents. Otellini said that this product is designed to allow users access to learning, and as time goes on, the user will be proactive to provide more relevant information. Although some companies have launched social networking services for groups of users to business users is, however, Otellini said that so far, we have also not been able to network widely used in the workplace. Otellini to many Web developers and entrepreneurs referred to the speech: “IT managers need for security and management type. I think this is a huge, and has not been opened up business opportunities. Users need to solve the problem was. In the Firewalls, many of the Web 2. 0 remains to be done. I am optimistic and believe that this is a great opportunity. “President of the Web 2. 0 Summit in San Francisco, the Federal founder of the media (John Battelle) also said that he planned to Facebook founder and CEO Mark Kebo Ge (Mark Zuckerberg) put forward the following questions, and that is not why Facebook U. S. companies to open?Otellini spoke, a stage of Intel’s employees demonstrated a product. He was a simulation of a typical scene: a passenger travel in China, but it does not recognize Chinese characters in front of the restaurant. He used his own mobile devices in the future to take these characters, these characters will soon be translated into English. In the second show, this mobile devices in the future to the supermarket in a toy camera, then there have been a series of content, including other clients use the new toy pictures, toys and so on the price. Otellini said that this mobile device operating principle is actually a hidden in the auditorium of the adoption of Intel’s desktop chips. But he predicts that by 2010 or 2011, Intel will be able to produce today compared to the performance of these desktop chips for mobile, wireless devices can be completely independent of the power of their play. Butler proposed that if the mobile chip functions so strong, then the battery on the request will be high. Otellini replied: “The battery problem, of course, we also took into account. We are trying to adopt ARM chips in the Intel architecture and power to consider the compatibility and functionality. “In talking about the iPhone, Otellini said that this is a historic device, but also change people’s expectations. He also said that he and his family are using the iPhone. Since Apple and AT & T after the successful launch of the iPhone, and other carriers have tried to contact Intel to develop more competitive products. Android mobile operating system and Intel may be able to launch a similar competition and Apple products.
Laptop Batteries Shop provide thoughtfully server for every laptop battery buyer. We are proud to supply you high quality cell [replacement] battery for HP, DELL, SONY, COMPAQ, IBM, ACER, APPLE, TOSHIBA, FUJITSU and so on. . . All of our batteries have achieved international standards such as CE and UL certification and certification ISO9001/9002. Have a nice experience!
Intel Back in the Graphics Game
Posted by: | CommentsIn the northern hemisphere, spring is always the time for new things: lambs, leaves and Larrabee chipsets. Yes, it’s the Intel Developers Forum in Beijing again, where Intel shows off its latest kit to the other manufacturers.
Pride of place was given to the Nehalem chipset, which features up to eight cores and uses simultaneous multi-threading across up to four cores. Intel showed a 25 per cent increase in performance over Penryn processors, and up to a 33 per cent reduction in power usage.
Also demonstrated was a Nehalem-powered game engine, featuring a meteor strike and flames spreading realistically through a village, with graphics, physics and animal Al being handled by different parts of the processor. Intel’s Ron Fosner said that multi-core chips could take over from discrete graphics cards, and are capable of providing a gaming experience reserved for top-end graphics cards. The Nehalem is expected in early 2009.
Still in its infancy, the Larrabee graphics processing unit marks Intel’s re-entry into the graphics cards. It features a 16 to 24 core chipset, capable of processing different instructions for ray-tracing or physics effects. Intel also showed off its Tukwila and Dunnington processors. Details on the Tukwila are sketchy, but it’s based on the Itanium chipset, will feature multiple cores and is due later this year. The Dunnington is the first Xeon chipset to make use of multiple cores.
Aside from Intel’s offerings, Samsung displayed its ultra-slim 1. 8-inch, 128GB solid state drive hard disks, and 4 to 8GB RAM configurations. Asus all-conquering Eee was shown with one of Intel’s new Atom processors, which promises better battery life and higher performance. And Intel’s own portable, learning-based Classmate 2 was paraded with a new 9-inch screen.
The most innovative third-party offerings was lightfield photography being touted by a digital photography company called ReFocus. Instead of capturing pixels, the tech traces the way light bounces around a scene. This results in pictures where every part of the image is in focus, and focus can even be adjusted after pictures have been taken. It’s processor-intensive, but this could result in cheaper, lighter and more versatile digital cameras.
Another great idea was displayed by Compal. Its laptop cooling system uses heatpipes to transfer heat away from the processor and onto the laptop’s lid, where it’s dispersed. There are no fans or moving parts, and the interior of the laptop can be totally sealed.
PC architecture is going to change substantially in the next few years, with integration and scalability being at the heart of Intel’s movements. In the future we can expect tiny PCs with graphics integrated into the processor and no moving parts, which can’t be bad.
and get up to date Computer Technology
News delivered right to your email box for free.
See website for details http://usacomputers. rr. nu and http://sacomputers. rr. nu.
Intel’s Larrabee Gpu
Posted by: | CommentsIntel’s brand new graphics chip is made of lots of ancient Pentium processors. Is that potty or pretty prescient?
Spare a thought for AMD and NVIDIA. They’ve been happily smacking each other upside the head for a decade. But at least they’ve been doing so safe in the knowledge that their GPUs are distinct from – and inherently superior in graphics processing terms – to CPUs.
At least, that used to be the case. Intel has now unveiled Larrabee, a co-processor based on an entirely new approach to graphics processing. If Intel has done its sums correctly, not only will the very definition of the GPU be unceremoniously defenestrated, but also AMD and NVIDIA’s graphics chips could even be pummeled to the very brink of existence.
If that sounds like hubris, try this for size. Larrabee could also tear up the rulebook for CPUs, too. That’s right, a single new architecture might just take over as ultimate all-round processor, eventually cannibalizing sales of Intel’s own conventional CPUs.
What exactly is this deathly destroyer, this harbinger of doom made manifest in 45nm silicon? Some sort of retro-engineered alien technology? Well, here’s the really hilarious bit. In simple terms, it’s just a metric crapload of old Pentium MMX processors crammed into a single processor die and mounted on a PCI Express board much like any other graphics card.
Exactly how many of these cores Larrabee contains Intel will as yet not be drawn on. Given that chips based on the Larrabee architecture won’t go on sale until late this year or early in 2010, it’s entirely possible Intel has yet to finalize the core count.
Watching the clock cycles
However, we do know that the Pentium-derived design of the cores makes them much smaller than those found in an Intel Core 2 die. In fact, Intel suggests 10 Larrabee cores can fit in the same space as a single 65nm Core 2 Duo die. Extrapolate out from that using the knowledge that Larrabee will be based on 45nm silicon technology and we reckon Larrabee chips will boast at least 32 cores at launch.
Other than the Pentium link, the other major feature of the Larrabee core architecture is a superwide floating point unit. Capable of handling 16 instructions per clock cycle, it’s four times as wide as the equivalent unit in one of Intel’s existing desktop CPUs. Factor in each core’s additional ability to support four software threads and the chip’s potential is truly staggering. It’s just possible that Larrabee might deliver 100 times the floating-point punch of a Core 2 Duo chip.
Impressive as that sounds, what we don’t know is how good this battery of general purpose and x86-compatible cores will actually be for graphics processing. Sure, it will be much more programmable than any graphics chip before. But that doesn’t mean it will be fast.
How it works
The key difference between Larrabee and all previous graphics chips is programmability. The latest DirectX 10 GPUs from AMD and NVIDIA may be much more flexible and programmable than their progenitors, but they retain a wide range of fixed function units for texture sampling, rasterization, geometry setup and more. Only the shader units are truly programmable and even those are much less flexible than a general purpose CPU.
A series of pipes
With Larrabee, the entire rendering pipeline is handled in software by a battery of small x86 cores. The only fixed function units are texture samplers, which Intel says allow for more efficient texture throughput and anisotropic filtering. In effect, therefore, the chip’s entire computational resources can be used to attack the most complex task at any given moment in time. In systems with up to 32 cores, benchmarking shows performance increasing in approximately a linear fashion relative to the number of processing cores.
Not only does that programmability make Larrabee theoretically more efficient than previous GPUs, it also means that only a software update will be required to allow Larrabee to support future graphics APIs.
and get up to date Computer Technology
News delivered right to your email box for free.
See website for details http://usacomputers. rr. nu and http://sacomputers. rr. nu.
Intel Announces New “sextium”; Processor
Posted by: | CommentsIndustry observers have wondered for some time, why Intel Pentium name for much more than the original Pentium. The Pentium Pro, Pentium II has been released and now the Pentium III, which many experts to speculate that it was time that the name was used Sextium. "In retrospect, do not know why not call the P-Pro Sextium" said Intel CEO Andy Grove said in an interview with Dan's Data. "I mean, not that there is something rude in Spanish, or something that matters." On the question of whether this is a disastrous decision concerning the original Intel Pentium Hispanic countries, such as the publication of Putanum , refused to discuss Mr. Grove. An Intel source, who asked to remain anonymous, he said, after Mr. Grove had left, and explained that he originally planned the new Intel processor, the call Hextium, but "a little too obvious to know what I mean, what? "We do not know what he meant. Sextium The new section is scheduled for 2nd Quarter 2000 debut with sales scheduled to begin exactly one year from 1 April Announcement product. The first bar) is only 666 MHz (133 MHz front side bus, 5X multiplier, as Intel has reported mysterious problems at higher speeds with the new component. Craig Johnson, a strategic planner for the Intel 32-bit, commented on difficulties in the following way: "It's not really a problem. 666 Megahertz is a very good speed. Very well done. Yes Gut." His eyes were glazed and then backed away slowly, apparently oblivious to our questions . The new contract prices for 1000 processor is expected to unprecedented US10, 000, though Intel is in a still unexplained alternative program of payment options at the end users appear to be necessary to sign a special contract have suggested, and, in turn Sextium receive a 666 MHz processor also confusing, as what "all their worldly desires." Ron Peck, director of marketing for Intel PC price, described it as a treatment special "wonderful value for small office and household use or for corporate users, or, rather, especially, really." If the details down in the specific contract, Peck said: "It is a simple mechanism, A . .. Covenant, if you like … between the chip and a larger number of customers … Power. "Asked if the power of" increased "in relation to Intel, he replied:" , of course. Yes Lol! What do you think I meant! Ha! The interview is over! Go! "A sample of the special contract was not available at the time of going to press, said a spokesman Intel, the company is experiencing "there are some minor problems with the acquisition of the right kind of parchment in the context." Package Sextium revolutionary new processor approaches the size of conventional II or Pentium III cartridges, but part in PIN ZIF Socket 514, PII / III edge connector. None of these "Socket 514" plates are currently available, but it is expected that Intel and other manufacturers have time for the release of Sextium. Representatives of the main motherboard manufacturer Abit, AOpen, Chaintech, Diamond, Shuttle, Supermicro and Tyan, said in a statement: "We are firmly in support of this exciting new processor needed. There is no doubt about our loyalty. No doubt. We do not fail us, Mr. Intel. "John Miner, Vice President and General Manager of Intel's Enterprise Server Division, said a Xeon version of the new CPU will be available for server applications." It will always fill the same niche as the current Pentium II and Pentium III Xeon, but the name will be different. "On the question of what explains the name of the new Xeon processor Miner:" It's kind of impossible to pronounce for people. It always begins with an X, though. "He continued that strong sales of the processor" Intel that is not designated must be "in companies like Procter & Gamble, Lucent and Microsoft, as well as the expected number of purchases "a significant market segment, this type underlying the two Xeon machines, and then run Windows 95 on it." Miner described below, this market segment Xeon, "sharp as a sack of wet toilet paper rolls. Robert Ječmen, Vice President and General Manager of mobile and handheld products, Intel Corporation, has also promised a mobile version of Sextium. "It will be mobile, so good. Everybody'll be your use. almost be him – ha ha – practically a part of you! "He referred to his hand and smiled. A spokesman for Pope John Paul II has made a statement on the new processor, which establishes that" exactly what we have been warning will be issued at this time, "adding:" That's all. You are on your own. Go on, go play Quake 3! Come on, do it! Let's see if we care! "Representatives of other religious orders were not an opinion. Dan's Data has received unconfirmed reports of clergy buying canned and preserved foods shotguns.
AMD Versus Intel CPU War
Posted by: | CommentsIf you buy at the market at a computer, chances are there. You can build a Hewlett-Packard, Gateway, IBM, or a custom system. But one thing I use all this equipment, and a CPU (Central Processing Unit) is. The CPU is responsible for designing and carrying out instructions of the motherboard. CPU is essential for the functioning of his new team. Intel CPU and AMD power virtually every personal computer, you can buy today. The dispute has an AMD CPU, compared with an Intel CPU and greater functionality, is now in full swing. Easy two years ago, this was not even a question. Everybody would say that the Intel-CPU, the speed and complex algorithm won the war with AMD CPU, no doubt. Fast-forward to today and now Intel is playing catch-up on the latest technologies from AMD. Intel marketing plays with their pricing is high and the CPU and announcing that the functionality they have, as the court. AMD started as a cheap alternative to brand manufacturers of computer CPU, such as mail and low-end machines from Compaq. They were from the beginning, AMD CPU is fighting an uphill battle because of the technology on Intel CPUs. Over the years, AMD has progressed. AMD now takes significantly in the wars of the quantities of consumers. AMD CPU equipped machines with similar performance characteristics, specifications, costs several hundred dollars less than comparable Intel CPU-based. This difference in cost is now sufficiently equipped to many customers push the upstart Intel CPU AMD CPU machines. If performance is the biggest concern about the price, was the first line includes the AMD 64-bit technology. In 2003, the first 64-bit AMD CPUs out on the market. It is unstable and unreliable at first. But the underlying architecture was correct. The AMD 64-bit CPU was running fast and stable. The performance of this AMD CPU Intel CPU captured the team taken by surprise. Intel had to compete rush to market their EMT64 CPU to this challenge from upstart AMD. The next item on the board was double CPU performance. Again an Intel CPU AMD increased the rule. AMD CPU's have the information in a dual chip machine that flows through the chip. The dual-CPU Intel has a jumper on the motherboard, where the information that flows through the dual-CPU will be processed for the division. The internal data flow of AMD CPU allows low heat generation based on dual-core Intel CPU. As consumers, this lower heat generation, AMD CPU allows increasing CPU from Intel. If you are aware of energy, then AMD CPU for you too. The AMD motherboard equipped with about 275 watts of power works. Compare that with an Intel also equipped with 400 watts of power, and you have to bring significant energy savings of AMD CPU. So where is the triumph of the Intel CPU AMD CPU? Intel CPU are able to quickly and work with individual programs. So if you are in a game and only play on your computer, the Intel CPU machine equipped and analyze the data move faster. But running in chat and email in the background and the machine's CPU AMD Add enough. Overall, the CPU processor execution of the war, which is currently between AMD and Intel, ideal for the consumer. Each company has a nose in the middle of a CPU processor beforehand, and both are looking to gain market share.
